RESEARCH ARTICLE


Effect of Low-Dose Corticosteroid Use on HBV Reactivation in HBsAg-positive Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients



Wooseong Jeong1, Jung-Yoon Choe2, Byung-Cheol Song3, Chang-Keun Lee4, Hoon-Suk Cha5, Byeongzu Ghang3, Jinseok Kim3, *
1 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
2 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
3 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
4 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
5 Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Article Information


Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2021
Volume: 15
First Page: 39
Last Page: 44
Publisher ID: TORJ-15-39
DOI: 10.2174/1874312902115010039

Article History:

Received Date: 8/1/2021
Revision Received Date: 23/2/2021
Acceptance Date: 15/3/2021
Electronic publication date: 12/07/2021
Collection year: 2021

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
2
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1953
Abstract HTML Views: 429
PDF Downloads: 258
ePub Downloads: 162
Total Views/Downloads: 2802
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1170
Abstract HTML Views: 224
PDF Downloads: 204
ePub Downloads: 123
Total Views/Downloads: 1721



Creative Commons License
© 2021 Jeong et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, 1753-3, Aran 13gil (Ara-1-dong), Jeju-Si, Jeju, Korea; Tel: +82-64-717-8000; Fax: +82-64-717-1131; E-mail: slera@yahoo.com


Abstract

Background:

It is well known that the use of corticosteroids (CS) results in increased viral replication and elevated alanine aminotransferase in hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients. However, only a few studies have investigated the effect of low-dose CS on HBV reactivation. In addition, there are few studies on the effects of synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on HBV reactivation.

Objective:

We investigated the reactivation of HBV in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with long-term low-dose corticosteroids. In addition, we analyzed factors affecting HBV reactivation, including disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed medical records and analyzed the incidence of HBV reactivation in RA patients who were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and who were receiving ≤10 mg of prednisolone over 4 weeks. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the factors that increase the risk of HBV reactivation.

Results:

A total of 141 patients were included in the study, out of which 24 (17.0%) patients had HBV reactivation. The administration of low-dose corticosteroids did not affect HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive RA patients (odds ratio: 0.807, 95% confidence interval: 0.143–4.546, p = 0.808), nor did the duration of corticosteroid administration, average daily corticosteroid dose, and cumulative corticosteroid dose. Administration of leflunomide was found to significantly increase the risk of HBV reactivation (odds ratio: 3.851, 95% confidence interval: 1.026–14.459, p = 0.046).

Conclusion:

The administration of low-dose corticosteroids did not affect the rate of HBV reactivation, suggesting that it can be used safely. Leflunomide may increase the risk of HBV reactivation; therefore, HBV patients should be carefully monitored when receiving this drug.

Keywords: Hepatitis B virus, Rheumatoid arthritis, Corticosteroids, Reactivation, Leflunomide, Drug.

1. INTRODUCTION

The use of high-dose corticosteroids (CS) in patients with hepatitis B leads to increased replication of the virus and elevated serum alanine aminotransferase concentration [1]. Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) has a transcription regulatory element (glucocorticoid response element) that is activated by CS [2]. This leads to increased viral proliferation when CS are used. In addition, cytotoxic T cells are inhibited by CS, and this promotes viral multiplication [3]. It has previously been reported that when high doses of corticosteroids (prednisolone ≥ 20 mg) were used for more than 4 weeks, the rate of HBV reactivation after steroid withdrawal was 30–67%, with some cases progressing to hepatic failure [4-8]. Therefore, many guidelines recommend that antiviral prophylaxis should be used if 20 mg or more of prednisolone is used for longer than 4 weeks [3, 9, 10]. However, the rate of HBV reactivation in patients receiving low doses of CS (prednisolone < 10 mg/day) is poorly established. There have been some reports of hepatitis aggravation and progression to hepatic failure after low-dose CS administration [11, 12]. However, hepatitis B can be exacerbated by spontaneous viral reactivation [9]. Hence it is difficult to conclude that the cases of hepatitis aggravation and progression were caused by low doses of CS. The American Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline, published in 2015, recommends prophylactic antiviral treatment when CS of less than 10 mg/day are given for more than 4 weeks to patients that are hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive or HBsAg negative/hepatitis B core (HBc) antibody-positive [13]. However, due to a lack of evidence, the recommended level of antiviral treatment is low. Hence, we investigated the reactivation of HBV when long-term low-dose corticosteroids were administered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who also have hepatitis B. Although many drugs have been developed and are newly used for RA treatment, we still recommend synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) as primary drugs and they are widely used. According to the current treatment guidelines, sDMARDs are considered to be relatively safe in HBV reactivation compared to biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in RA patients with HBV, but there are few studies supporting this and the level of evidence is low [10]. Therefore, we simultaneously analyzed factors affecting HBV reactivation including sDMARDs.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

This hospital-based observational study was approved by the ethical committee of the institutional review board of Jeju University Hospital (approval number 2013-02-009). All experiments were performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki, and the need for written informed consent was waived by the ethics committee.

2.1. Study Design and Patient Selection

We retrospectively reviewed the available data from patients with RA who had the HBsAg in four university hospitals between February 1996 and June 2017. The records from a total of 2437 patients with RA were reviewed; of these, 141 patients were found to be HBsAg positive via the screening test performed at the time of RA diagnosis. We investigated the incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with RA who were HBsAg positive and who were receiving <10 mg of prednisolone or equivalent doses of other steroids for over 4 weeks, and in HBsAg-positive patients with RA who did not receive steroids. Patients who received antiviral prophylaxis were excluded from this study. All patients in this study fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology 1987 revised criteria or 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative classification criteria for RA.

2.2. Drugs and Definition

The sDMARDs used in this study were methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), sulfasalazine (SSZ), tacrolimus, and cyclosporine. The biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) included tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), tocilizumab, and abatacept. Drug exposure was considered when a patient took CS, sDMARDs, or bDMARDs for > 4 weeks.

We defined HBV reactivation as >10 times increase in HBV DNA level or reappearance of HBV DNA in the serum, as in previous studies [14, 15]. Low-dose CS was defined as < 10 mg of prednisolone (PD) or its equivalent.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables or as frequencies for categorical variables. The significance of differences between groups was determined by using the t-test and chi-squared test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the factors that increase the risk of HBV reactivation. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Study Population

Among 141 patients who were positive for HBsAg, 103 (73%) were females, and the mean age at diagnosis was 50.5 (17-78) years (Table 1). The average disease duration for RA patients was 9.2 (0.1-33.5) years. Some patients had underlying diseases such as diabetes mellitus (13) (9.2%) and hypertension (22) (15.6%). Five (3.5%) had a history of pulmonary tuberculosis, and 3 (2.1%) had a history of malignancy. None of the patients with malignancies were receiving chemotherapy. The mean baseline levels of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were 28.2 U/L and 26.9 U/L, respectively.

In total, 128 patients (90.8%) were taking CS and the mean daily CS dose (converted to PD dose) was 4.3 (0.23-9.7) mg. Other immunosuppressive drugs taken by patients were MTX (60, 42.6%), LEF (12, 8.5%), SSZ (70, 49.6%), HCQ (100, 70.9%), tacrolimus (6, 4.3%), and cyclosporine (3, 2.1%). A total of 7 (5.0%) patients received TNFi.

3.2. Incidence and Baseline Characteristics of Hepatitis B virus Reactivation

HBV reactivation occurred in 24 (17.0%) of the included patients. The patients were divided into a CS administration group and a non-CS administration group (Table 1). There was no significant difference in age (50.3 vs. 55.5, p = 0.130) or gender (female, 71.1% vs. 92.3%, p = 0.186) between the two groups. There was no substantial difference between the two groups in terms of the underlying disease. Further, the HBV profile did not differ between the two groups. There was no significant difference in disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) use for any of the following drugs: MTX (43.8% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.558), LEF (8.6% vs. 7.7%, p = 1.000), SSZ (51.6% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.244), HCQ (71.9% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.523), and TNF-α inhibitor (5.5% vs. 0%, p = 1.000). The mean duration from commencement of CS administration to HBV reactivation was 46.4 (1.2-215.1) months. The number of patients with HBV reactivation after CS discontinuation was 2 (1.4%), and the meantime to HBV reactivation after CS discontinuation was 22.2 (15.2-35.4) months. Seven patients received TNFi.

When the patients were divided into HBV-reactivated and HBV-non-reactivated groups (Table 2), the mean age was 50.0 vs. 50.6 (p = 0.829). There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The proportion of patients receiving CS did not differ considerably between the two groups (91.7 vs. 90.6, p = 1.000). The proportion of patients receiving MTX, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and TNFi did not differ, but there were more patients receiving LEF (20.8% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.033) and HCQ (87.5% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.052) in the group of patients who had HBV reactivation. HBV reactivation occurred in 41.7% of patients receiving LEF and 28.6% of patients receiving TNF- α inhibitor.

The mean duration of CS administration (30.5 months vs. 49.8 months, p = 0.106) and mean CS administration dose (4.1 mg vs. 3.8 mg, p = 0.643) were higher in the group of patients who had HBV reactivation, but the differences were not statistically significant. During low-dose CS administration, more than half of HBV reactivation (54.5%) occurred within a year (Fig. 1). The mean duration between HBV reactivation after RA treatment was 60.8 (1.4-257.7) months.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics between groups according to the use of corticosteroids.
- Total CS use CS non-use P-value
- 141 128 (90.8) 13 (9.2) -
Sex, female 103 (73.0) 91 (71.1) 12 (92.3) 0.186
Age 50.5 ± 12.3 50.0±12.5 55.5±8.8 0.130
Comorbidities
DM 13 (9.2) 13 (10.2) 0 (0) 0.610
HT 22 (15.6) 22 (17.2) 0 (0) 0.221
Pul. Tb 5 (3.5) 4 (3.1) 1 (7.7) 0.388
malignancy 3 (2.1) 2 (1.6) 1 (7.7) 0.254
Alcohol 6 (4.3) 6 (4.7) 0 (0) 1.000
HBV profile
HBsAb 3 (2.5) 3 (2.5) 0 (0) 1.000
HBeAb 85 (60.3) 75 (78.9) 10 (100) 0.203
HbeAg 17 (12.1) 17 (17.9) 0 (0) 0.360
HBcAb 77 (54.6) 67 (91.8) 10 (100) 1.000
DNA copy (log, IU/mL) 2.35±2.54 2.39±2.60 2.07±1.96 0.666
HBV reactivation 24 (17.0) 22 (17.2) 2 (15.4) 1.000
AST 28.2±34.3 28.6±37.5 23.8±5.8 0.673
ALT 26.9±36.0 27.6±37.5 19.8±12.5 0.458
DMARDs
MTX 60 (42.6) 56 (43.8) 4 (30.8) 0.558
LEF 12 (8.5) 11 (8.6) 1 (7.7) 1.000
SSZ 70 (49.6) 66 (51.6) 4 (30.8) 0.244
HCQ 100 (70.9) 92 (71.9) 8 (61.5) 0.523
TC 6 (4.3) 6 (4.7) 0 (0) 1.000
Cys 3 (2.1) 3 (2.3) 0 (0) 1.000
TNFi 7 (5.0) 7 (5.5) 0 (0) 1.000
CS, corticosteroid; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension; Pul. Tb, pulmonary tuberculosis; HBV, hepatitis B virus; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine, aminotransferase; DMARD, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; MTX, methotrexate; LEF, leflunomide; SSZ, sulfasalazine; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; TC, tacrolimus; Cys, cyclosporine; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor.
The numbers in brackets indicate a percentage.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics between groups depending on whether HBV reactivation.
- HBV reactivation HBV non-reactivation P-value
- 24 (17.0) 117 (83.0) -
Sex, female 17 (70.8) 86 (73.5) 0.788
Age 50.0±13.6 50.6±12.1 0.829
HBV profile
HBsAb 0 (0) 3 (2.7) 1.000
HbeAg 2 (13.3) 15 (16.7) 1.000
HBeAb 12 (85.7) 73 (80.2) 1.000
HBcAb 13 (100) 64 (91.4) 0.583
HBV DNA copy (log, IU/mL) 1.91±2.6 2.45±2.5 0.347
AST 37.3±62.0 26.3±25.2 0.402
ALT 41.3±77.8 23.9±17.7 0.286
DMARDs
MTX 11 (45.8) 49 (41.9) 0.721
LEF 5 (20.8) 7 (6.0) 0.033*
SSZ 15 (62.5) 55 (47.0) 0.167
HCQ 21 (87.5) 79 (67.5) 0.052
TC 2 (8.3) 4 (3.4) 0.270
Cys 0 (0) 3 (2.6) 1.000
TNFi 2 (8.3) 5 (4.3) 0.340
Corticosteroid
CS use 22 (91.7) 106 (90.6) 1.000
CS duration (month) 30.5±45.6 49.8±54.4 0.106
Mean CS dose (converted to PD dose) 4.1±2.1 3.8±2.2 0.643
HBV, hepatitis B virus; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine, aminotransferase; DMARD, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; MTX, methotrexate; LEF, leflunomide; SSZ, sulfasalazine; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; TC, tacrolimus; Cys, cyclosporine; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; CS, corticosteroid; PD, prednisolone The numbers in brackets indicate a percentage.

Fig. 1. Trend curve of HBV reactivation during low-dose corticosteroid administration.
More than half (54.5%) of the HBsAg-positive RA patients receiving low-dose CS showed a tendency to develop HBV reactivation within 1 year after CS administration.

3.3. Factors Associated with Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation

To identify factors affecting HBV reactivation, logistic regression was performed on CS, immunosuppressive drugs, and other known risk factors of HBV reactivation (Table 3). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that CS administration, mean CS administration dose, and cumulative CS administration dose did not affect HBV reactivation. However, LEF administration was found to significantly increase the risk of HBV reactivation (odds ratio 4.135, 95% CI 1.189–14.386, p = 0.026), and HCQ administration showed a tendency to increase the risk of HBV reactivation (odds ratio 3.367, 95% CI 0.945–11.991, p = 0.061). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, only LEF administration was found to significantly increase the risk of HBV reactivation (odds ratio 3.851, 95% CI 1.026–14.459, p = 0.046).

Table 3. Adjusted logistic regression analysis for factors associated with hepatitis B virus reactivation.
- Odds ratio 95% CI P-value
Age 0.995 0.956-1.036 0.814
Sex 0.764 0.268-2.177 0.615
HBV DNA copy (log, IU/mL) 0.948 0.779-1.154 0.596
CS use 0.807 0.143-4.546 0.808
LEF 3.851 1.026-14.459 0.046*
HCQ 2.986 0.788-11.305 0.107
SSZ 1.451 0.552-3.817 0.450
TNFi 1.329 0.204-8.642 0.766
HBV, hepatitis B virus; CS, corticosteroid; LEF, Leflunomide; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; SSZ, sulfasalazine; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor
p < 0.05 considered significant and marked with *

4. DISCUSSION

Low-dose CS (< 10 mg prednisone or its equivalent) therapies administered for over 4 weeks may increase the risk of viral reactivation by up to 10% in HBsAg-positive individuals [16]. About 10–20% of HBV inactive carriers progress to cirrhosis due to recurrent reactivation and inactivation [9, 17]. In general, HBV reactivation is known to occur much more frequently (up to eight times) in HBsAg-positive patients than in HBsAg-negative / anti-HBc-positive patients [16, 18]. Pattullo et al. reported that HBV reactivation in RA patients occurred in 12.3% of HBsAg-positive patients and 3–5% of HBsAg-negative / anti-HBc-positive patients [18]. Chen et al. showed that the combination of immunosuppressive drugs increases the risk of HBV reactivation [19]. In our study, HBV reactivation occurred in 17.1% of patients taking low-dose CS. This is a higher reactivation rate compared to previous studies [18, 20], which may be because all study participants were HBsAg positive and were taking immunosuppressive drugs in addition to low-dose CS. Herein, low-dose CS did not appear to increase the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients with RA. Therefore, antiviral prophylaxis may not be required when low-dose CS are administered in HBsAg-positive patients with RA.

HBV reactivation can occur within the first 2 weeks of commencing chemotherapy or within 1 year of withdrawing immunosuppressive therapy [16]. In this study, none of the patients taking low-dose CS had HBV reactivation within a month. However, more than half (54.5%) of the cases of HBV reactivation occurred within a year. Therefore, even if the risk of HBV reactivation is low when taking low-dose CS, it is necessary to carefully monitor HBV reactivation for 1 year.

We analyzed the factors affecting HBV reactivation and found that the use of CS did not affect HBV reactivation. In contrast, the use of LEF did increase the risk of HBV reactivation significantly. Our findings are consistent with those of Xu et al., who showed a 30% increased risk of HBV reactivation in patients taking 10 mg of LEF [21]. The American Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline classifies MTX as a low-risk drug and states that prophylactic antiviral therapy should not be used routinely, but there is no mention of HBV reactivation risks associated with the administration of LEF and other sDMARDs. Although it is not yet possible to form a definite conclusion, LEF administration seems to increase the risk of HBV reactivation based on the results of previous studies and our study. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor closely for HBV reactivation when LEF is administered to patients with RA. A well-designed study of HBV reactivation secondary to LEF is needed to verify the findings of this study.

Biologic agents, such as TNFi, have been developed and are widely used. These drugs have been classified as moderate-risk drugs with regard to HBV reactivation. In the current study, 7 patients received TNFi, 2 (28.6%) of whom developed HBV reactivation; and both cases occurred during the administration of adalimumab. This reactivation rate is similar to that of previous studies on HBV reactivation during TNFi administration [22, 23]. Although the administration of TNFi did not increase the risk of HBV reactivation, the number of patients who were administrated TNFi was too small to determine statistical significance.

Several limitations of this study should be considered. The main limitations of this study were the cross-sectional, retrospective, observational design, and the laboratory data used were obtained by reviewing medical records. Secondly, the number of patients not receiving CS was small. Third, only the effect of DMARD administration on HBV reactivation was analyzed. The effect on HBV reactivation according to the dose of DMARDs was not analyzed.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that low-dose CS administration had no additional effect on HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients with RA who are taking DMARDs, suggesting that it is safe to use such drugs in this patient population. However, the combination of low-dose CS with immunosuppressants such as LEF may increase the risk of HBV reactivation. In such cases, it may be safer to monitor HBV reactivation more carefully, including the check of HBV DNA titer. Further prospective studies on the effects of sDMARDs on HBV reactivation are needed.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CS  = Corticosteroids
HBV  = Hepatitis B Virus
HBsAg  = Hepatitis B Surface Antigen
HBc  = Hepatitis B Core Antibody
RA  = Rheumatoid Arthritis
sDMARDs  = Synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs
MTX  = Methotrexate
LEF  = Leflunomide
HCQ  = Hydroxychloroquine
SSZ  = Sulfasalazine
bDMARDs  = Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs
TNF  = Tumor Necrosis Factor
PD  = Prednisolone
DMARDs  = Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This hospital-based observational study was approved by the ethical committee of the institutional review board of Jeju National University Hospital (approval number 2013-02-009).

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No animals were used in this research. All human research procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national), and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available in order to protect the privacy of the study participants. However, they are available from the corresponding author [J.K] on reasonable request.

FUNDING

This work was supported by a research grant from Jeju National University Hospital in 2016.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Sehee Kim for supporting us in reviewing and filling up research data.

REFERENCES

[1] Yeo W, Johnson PJ. Diagnosis, prevention and management of hepatitis B virus reactivation during anticancer therapy. Hepatology 2006; 43(2): 209-20.
[2] Tur-Kaspa R, Burk RD, Shaul Y, Shafritz DA. Hepatitis B virus DNA contains a glucocorticoid-responsive element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83(6): 1627-31.
[3] Di Bisceglie AM, Lok AS, Martin P, Terrault N, Perrillo RP, Hoofnagle JH. Recent US Food and Drug Administration warnings on hepatitis B reactivation with immune-suppressing and anticancer drugs: Just the tip of the iceberg? Hepatology 2015; 61(2): 703-11.
[4] Liaw YF, Tsai SL, Chien RN, Yeh CT, Chu CM. Prednisolone priming enhances Th1 response and efficacy of subsequent lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2000; 32(3): 604-9.
[5] Perrillo RP, Schiff ER, Davis GL, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of interferon alfa-2b alone and after prednisone withdrawal for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 1990; 323(5): 295-301.
[6] Hoofnagle JH, Davis GL, Pappas SC, et al. A short course of prednisolone in chronic type B hepatitis. Report of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104(1): 12-7.
[7] Scullard GH, Smith CI, Merigan TC, Robinson WS, Gregory PB. Effects of immunosuppressive therapy on viral markers in chronic active hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 1981; 81(6): 987-91.
[8] Lee SD, Tong MJ, Wu JC, Lin HC, Tsai YT, Lo KJ. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of prednisolone therapy in HBeAg and HBV DNA positive Chinese patients with chronic active hepatitis B. J Hepatol 1991; 12(2): 246-50.
[9] Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2007; 45(2): 507-39.
[10] Reddy KR, Beavers KL, Hammond SP, Lim JK, Falck-Ytter YT. American Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline on the prevention and treatment of hepatitis B virus reactivation during immunosuppressive drug therapy. Gastroenterology 2015; 148(1): 215-9.
[11] Hyang Ie L, Geum-Youn G, Moon Kyung P, et al. The effect of low dose corticosteroid therapy on viral reactivation in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Korean J Med 2008; 74(6): 619-23.
[12] Bae JH, Sohn JH, Lee HS, et al. A fatal case of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during long-term, very-low-dose steroid treatment in an inactive HBV carrier. Clin Mol Hepatol 2012; 18(2): 225-8.
[13] Perrillo RP, Gish R, Falck-Ytter YT. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on prevention and treatment of hepatitis B virus reactivation during immunosuppressive drug therapy. Gastroenterology 2015; 148(1): 221-44.
[14] Lau GK, Yiu HH, Fong DY, et al. Early is superior to deferred preemptive lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B patients undergoing chemotherapy. Gastroenterology 2003; 125(6): 1742-9.
[15] Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: Update 2009. Hepatology 2009; 50(3): 661-2.
[16] Loomba R, Liang TJ. Hepatitis B reactivation associated with immune suppressive and biological modifier therapies: Current concepts, management strategies, and future directions. Gastroenterology 2017; 152(6): 1297-309.
[17] Chen YC, Sheen IS, Chu CM, Liaw YF. Prognosis following spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients with or without concurrent infection. Gastroenterology 2002; 123(4): 1084-9.
[18] Pattullo V. Prevention of Hepatitis B reactivation in the setting of immunosuppression. Clin Mol Hepatol 2016; 22(2): 219-37.
[19] Chen MH, Chen MH, Liu CY, et al. Hepatitis B virus reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing biologics treatment. J Infect Dis 2017; 215(4): 566-73.
[20] Tan J, Zhou J, Zhao P, Wei J. Prospective study of HBV reactivation risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients who received conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Clin Rheumatol 2012; 31(8): 1169-75.
[21] Ming-Xu H, Chen M, Cai Y, Yan-Jia H. Clinical outcomes of low-dose leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis complicated with Hepatitis B virus carriage and safety observation. Pak J Med Sci 2015; 31(2): 320-4.
[22] Pérez-Alvarez R, Díaz-Lagares C, García-Hernández F, et al. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-targeted therapy: Analysis of 257 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2011; 90(6): 359-71.
[23] Lee YH, Bae SC, Song GG. Hepatitis B virus reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients with rheumatic diseases undergoing anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy or DMARDs. Int J Rheum Dis 2013; 16(5): 527-31.